|
The
process of urbanization, and the general state of tension and rhythm
of work and life at the present day, together with the incessant
changes in city environment, are circumstances which are creating,
for contemporary man, a need for values and principles radically
different from those he has been used to.
In our analysis of those settlements in our country in which the
architecture of the past century has been preserved, emphasis will
be laid in those laws of construction which are an ethical necessity
for the ordinary man and remain instructive for the creators of
contemporary architecture. In actual fact, subconscious acceptance
of these values renders the distinction between ordinary man and
architect artificial, for in this context they are one and the same.
Here
there is complete fulfillment of the need for settlements with a
population small enough to enable everyone to know everyone else
by sight; while at the same time the building rules which have been
applied can provide the present day town-planner with the ideal
norms as regards building density. These same rules obey the principle
that the natural features of the land are inviolable, thus creating
an innate reverence for Nature. Low buildings whose location is
a perfectly natural one can indeed create the illusion of actually
having emerged from the ground. A settlement consisting of similar
but not identical houses, with public buildings in spatial harmony
with its houses and streets, and the whole in harmony with the natural
environment will have something to teach us about unity of aspect.
It will also emerge from a study of such settlements that there
are in reality only two rules in town planning, namely, good ethics
and naturalness: no house should stand in the way of any other,
and its position on the building plot should be determined by the
simple fact that it is the only possible one. The house and its
wall courtyard will give us a sense and of the need of a world of
our own - of our own piece of sky and our own bit of Nature. The
street, which will lie outside those personal worlds represented
by the houses with their courtyards, will be a place where a people
can suitably meet together.
The small squares formed by the crossing of two streets or the open
space between several gates are public places,
|
|
which
provide an opportunity for contacts, a talk with a neighboror a casual
passerby, or merely for watching for street activity in which one
may wish to take part.
In
the sphere of external perception an ordinary man will make a desperate
attempt to understand a problem on which he posses no reliable source
of guidance.. Any attempt to apprise architecture in the absence of
the necessary criteria or any other assistance will lead to other
incomprehension. But in vernacular architecture the simplicity of
the natural material used and visible character of the building as
a whole are such that we can readily see what has been done and why
it has been done, and these factors together with what, in the true
sense of the word, can be called decoration, give us the basic elements
for an appraisal.The principle material is wood, and these we can
understand intuitively; we have a sense of the dimensions required,
the system of assembly and the system of decoration.
Man is thus freed from oppressive ideas about something, which is
quite beyond his comprehension and is able to appreciate - apart from
its utilitarian qualities - that quality which makes each building
more than mere architecture and which consists in its individual artistic
image. If an explanation of this image is sought for, it will be found
in the owner's personal participation in the building work, the uniting
of creation and execution in the person of the master craftsman. In
the process of creation there will have been none of the usual distinctions
between the designer on his "superior" level and the mere executant
deprived of any individuality of his own, and in the last analysis
this artistic image is perhaps also partly the outcome of a natural
attitude towards house building as a useful activity like any other-
the civilization of land, for example - which is necessary to life.
What the vernacular architect will require is an atmosphere of unsophistication
in which the primitive values of architecture can manifest themselves,
and there will be none of that painfully- thought - out work of creation
which is the lot of the contemporary architect, overburdened as he
is with accumulated knowledge and information.
Stefan BEYAZOV
|
|